Lab Cat

23 Mar 2007

Beer Aging Part 2

Filed under: Chemistry, Research — Cat @ 1:08 pm

Beer bottles

In a previous post I reviewed a recently published article on beer aging. I got so interested that I found a review of the chemical changes occurring in beer written by the same authors. While it might have been helpful do that before writing the previous post, it was writing that post that got me interested in reading more about this topic.

As mentioned, the problem with beer shelf-life is that it isn’t really stable [no food is – most food would be defined a “metastable”. Yep, even Twinkies]. During storage, chemicals continue to react which alters the flavor, both taste and smell. This can be positive; for example, wine and whiskey are left to “age” so that their flavors can develop; In beer, the flavor changes are typically seen negative as the beer no longer tastes as it ought. It might not taste “bad” but it tastes differently to expectation. This is particularly important for branded beers. A regular drinker of Heineken[*] knows what taste to expect and would be disappointed if it tasted differently. This is not just beer, but all food. For example, if are you used to eating Kellogg’s Cornflakes and then try switching to the store labeled corn flakes, the taste just is not the same.

So what happens to beer during storage? In the article reviewed in my previous post, they looked at fifteen different markers which were produced by several different reactions. According to the article I am discussing today (“The chemistry of beer aging – a critical review) the main reactions taking place in packaged beer are:

1) Reactive oxygen species in stored beer

2) Reaction leading to formation of carbonyl compounds

a. Oxidation of higher alcohols

b. Strecker degradation of amino acids[†]

c. Aldol condensation

d. Degradation of hop bitter acids[‡]

e. Oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids, including enzymatic breakdown

f. Formation of (E)-beta-damascenone

3) Acetalization of aldehydes

4) Maillard reaction

5) Synthesis and hydrolysis of volatile esters

6) Formation of dimethyltrisulfide

7) Degradation of polyphenols

Having teased you with that list, I am now going to ignore it completely to discuss inhibition.

The most important way beer in which beer chemistry changes during in storage is through oxidation reactions. In the list above at least three of the staling mechanisms are directly caused by oxidation, if not more. So beer can be protected by limiting the amount of oxygen present when the beer is bottled. This includes both headspace and dissolved oxygen. It is also why you won’t see beer in plastic bottles any time soon[§].

Oxidation can also be prevented by the addition of antioxidants. These include sulphite, which is produced by yeasts in beer from sulphate; polyphenols from barley malt and hops; melanoidins produced by the Maillard reaction during heating steps such as malt roasting and wort boiling. Ascorbic acid and chelating agents could also be added after processing.

The prevention of enzymatic oxidation is also important. The enzymes which cause the problems in beer are lipoxygenases. Their activity may be reduced by lowering the pH. Additionally, choosing barleys with low lipoxygenase activity might also help. You could heat the malt to a temperature that would cause the enzyme to be destroyed, but this will destroy desirable enzymes.

Non-oxidative beer aging reactions are very diverse and, therefore, harder to control and inhibit. Many of these reactions were promoted by reducing the beer pH. Sulphite was considered useful as it inhibits the Maillard reaction in addition to, as mentioned above, inhibiting oxidation.

I don’t know about you, but writing this has made me thirsty. See you down the pub!

Reference:

Vanderhaegen, B., H. Neven, et al. (2006). “The chemistry of beer aging – a critical review.” Food Chemistry 95(3): 357-381.


[*] This is no reference on Heineken, it was the only branded beer that I could think of at that moment. Replace with the name of your favorite beer.

[†] I personally consider the Strecker degradation reaction as part of the Maillard reaction.

[‡] This one, to me, should also be a category of its own as the loss of bitter flavor can destroy the taste of beer.

[§] Go on, some one tell me about a beer in a plastic bottle. And then tell me tastes good in six month.s

Advertisements

6 Comments »

  1. What’s the chemistry behind light induced skunking (light struck beer)?

    Comment by RPM — 23 Mar 2007 @ 5:26 pm

  2. You are so right about the oxygen. Oxygen is evil. Well, for beer at least. I’ve ruined a couple of batches of beer by allowing them to mix with too much oxygen during a transfer to a bottling bucket [“ruined” is a pretty strong word, considering I still drank the stuff and it was better than Bud Light]. I quickly changed my practices.

    There are also oxygen absorbing bottle caps. These are meant for long term storage.

    I’m eventually going to get to this topic in my blog. I’ll just link to your posts.

    …and beer in plastic bottles is ONLY meant for use in stadiums where bottles thrown by moronic fans will do much less damage than glass. Other than that, beer should never touch plastic (except for bottling, in my case).

    Comment by Chemgeek — 24 Mar 2007 @ 1:45 am

  3. Salt is a chemically stable food- providing you don’t get it wet…

    Comment by Lab Lemming — 24 Mar 2007 @ 4:45 am

  4. RPM

    I think skunking is caused by light induced oxidation. From what I can gather light reacts with iso-alpha-acids from the hops to form 3-methyl-2-butene-1- thiol. Check out this link: http://www.evansale.com/skunked_beer.html

    Chemgeek

    Alcohol and stadiums brings back bad memories of English football matches. It wasn’t the container that was the problem, but the contents. Not that I ever went to matches; too violent, but catching early morning or late evening trains with drunken football fans. Shudder.

    Lab Lemming

    Both salt and sugar (sucrose) are not really foods, IMO, but ingredients. The getting them wet is part of the storage problem.

    Comment by Cat — 26 Mar 2007 @ 10:45 am

  5. The salt thing is true, you can’t get it wet or it’s gone

    Comment by Tijned — 21 Jul 2007 @ 10:21 am

  6. very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
    Idetrorce

    Comment by Idetrorce — 15 Dec 2007 @ 8:39 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: